Data Center Timeline

CONTINUE TO THE CURRENT DATA CENTER CITIZEN PROPOSAL
VIEW THE 4×4 CITIZEN BRIEFS
READ THE CITIZEN ISSUE PAPERS
VIEW SOURCE DOCUMENTS

2025

JANUARY 16, 2025

Amazon AWS Shows Interest in NKC

AWS presents to the New Kent Economic Development Authority.

From the minutes:
The EDA members received a presentation on data centers from AWS representatives Alex Kang, Jordan Tate, and Stephanie Mouman. Data centers are very secure facilities which may house/store information from numerous companies. Key takeaways from the presentation include when searching for potential sites to construct a data center, certain factors are considered such as power, water, fiber and easy access, with emphasis on power as the most important.

April 28, 2025

Sole source contract with Dewberry Engineering

To rank locations for data centers

On April 28, 2025, the New Kent County Board of Supervisors authorized a sole source contract with Dewberry Engineering to:

  • Examine and categorize existing county parcels/sites.
  • Identify and rank locations where data center development could serve as the “highest and best use.”

Read more…

JULY 2025

Staff review of the site study.

AUGUST 2025

Map revisions.

SEPTEMBER 2025

The County’s own timeline references

Individual BOS meetings

The County’s own timeline references:

“Individual BOS meetings — Insights, thoughts, concerns and general direction.”

Who attended those individual BOS meetings?

Which supervisors were briefed?

What information was presented?

What concerns were raised?

What “general direction” was given?

Were all five supervisors given equal information and equal opportunity to provide direction?

Where are the records of those meetings?

OCTOBER THROUGH DECEMBER 2025

Research, investigation, refinement, and TOD drafting

November 25, 2025

Thomas Evelyn Discusses New Kent’s Data Center Site Study During PointOne Presentation to Charles City BOS

On November 25, 2025, the Chairman of the New Kent County Board of Supervisors declared his intentions for NKC data centers clear in his address to the Charles City County Board of Supervisors.

Watch this link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDxgwkXsg-Q&t=1261s

QUESTION RAISED BY THE RECORD

At this point in the New Kent TOD development process, what information concerning the Route 33 corridor was public, and what information had only been shared through internal County discussions?

[bold_timeline_item_button title=”Expand” style=”” shape=”” color=”” size=”inline” url=”#” el_class=”bold_timeline_group_button”]

2026

February 2026

TOD Proposed to Planning Commission

Draft materials proposing a “Technology Overlay District” (TOD) were presented to the Planning Commission in February 2026, with further review and public hearings by the Board of Supervisors scheduled for early 2026.

Read the presentation:

https://www.newkent-va.us/DocumentCenter/View/9842/TOD-Presentation-22026-PDF

July 13, 2026

Board Discontinues the Proposed Technology Overlay District

The Board voted unanimously to stop work on the proposed TOD and directed staff to continue developing a separate data-center ordinance.

New Kent’s Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to direct county to discontinue working on the TOD and using it as framework for data center regulations.

Instead, the board asked the staff to continue with the directive to prepare a draft data center ordinance for view by September.

Read about it:

https://nkccnews.com/local-news/2026/07/15/technology-overlay-district-shot-down-in-new-kent-county/

July 13, 2026

Route 33 Rezoning Approved by 3–2 Vote

The Board rezoned approximately 343 acres for industrial, light-industrial, office, and commercial uses. The vote did not approve a data center; any future data-center proposal would require separate review and approval.

July 15, 2026

Chronicle Reports Technology Overlay District Vote

Coverage of the Board’s July 13 action to discontinue the proposed TOD and continue work on a separate data-center ordinance.

September 18, 2026

Times-Dispatch Reports on Land Sale and Disclosure Questions

Michael Martz reported residents’ concerns about a separate property transaction involving Supervisor Thomas Evelyn and the developer connected to the July rezoning. Evelyn and county officials maintained that the matters were separate and that no conflict required recusal.

[bold_timeline_item_button title=”Expand” style=”” shape=”” color=”” size=”inline” url=”#” el_class=”bold_timeline_group_button”]
Living Record Notice:
This website is a living public-record library. Pages may be updated, corrected, or expanded as additional records are received, reviewed, or verified. Please check back regularly for updates.